Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Free Speech and Boxing

Combat sports are best defined as competitive full contact contest where two opponents engage in an exchange of lethal strikes. These strikes are interpreted as points according to the judges' scores cards. A competitor wins by either landing the most significant strikes or rendering his opponent "unable to intelligently defend himself" or technical knockout. Knockouts are typically when an opponent is no longer conscious or has a cut above his eye, disabling his vision and preventing him from making a convincing come back. Combat sports include a wide variety of disciplines which consist of but are not limited to kickboxing, boxing, karate, wrestling, Brazilian jujitsu, karate, and Tae Kwon Do. How long have combat sports been around? According to oral tradition whenever a man first raised his fist toward another man in a gesture of play.
Mixed Martial Arts and Boxing are the two most popular self defense mechanisms and even broken the mainstream with multi-million dollar industries that continue to advertise and promote fights.  Controversy has surrounded that sport since the phrase , “I ain’t got no quarrel with them Viet Cong,” was first uttered by three time world heavyweight champion Muhammad Ali. Not only did Ali upset White America by resisting the military draft but also by identifying as a member of the nation of Islam. Ali's failure to comply with federal law resulted in him being striped of his title belt, a $10,000 fine, and a 10 year prison sentence. The supreme court in 1971 would reverse they're initial decision in the famous Clay v. The United States court case. 
Despite many boxing fans awaiting to see his return in the ring many argued that one who indulges in violence for a living cannot object to the violence of war. Though Ali held a hypocritical perspective, his freedom of religion was still infringed upon by the United States government due to Islam's beliefs regarding war. 
Nobody asks other boxers about their religion. 
But now that I’m the champion, 
I am the king, so it seems the world is all 
Shook up about what I believe. 
You call it the Black Muslims, I don’t. 
This is the name that has 
Been given to us by the press. 
The real name is Islam. 
That means peace.”
— Muhammad Ali, 

Ali's anti war rhetoric made him a target for the government. His refusal in the draft resulted in him losing millions of dollars and even held back his career to an extent. These are restrictions on his freedom of speech because his boxing was not only him throwing jabs at a man in the ring. An African American heavyweight champion communicated how to achieve and be successful through his victories. However his greatest victory of all was not in the ring but in the courtroom. 

1 comment:

  1. As evidenced by your post, Jake, “there was always far more to Muhammad than what took place in the boxing ring” (ACLU). You articulated this when you said, “Ali's anti war rhetoric made him a target for the government. His refusal in the draft resulted in him losing millions of dollars and even held back his career to an extent.” Ali made monumental sacrifices in order to utilize his First Amendment rights.

    When reading your post, I couldn’t help but liken Ali’s speech to his boxing strategies. Ali was known for his “rope-a-dope”(Britannica) tactic in the ring. In essence, the boxer employing this strategy takes a defensive stance, leaning back on the ropes. As a result, the ropes absorb the opponent’s punches rather than the body. After a while, the opponent fatigues from throwing ineffective punches. When fatigue sets in, the boxer leaning on the ropes begins to counterattack the fatigued opponent. Ali famously used this tactic to claim the world champion title when he beat George Foreman in 1974.

    Ali’s boxing strategy parallels his approach to free speech. When speaking out against the Vietnam War, Ali absorbed the punches – he was fined, went to jail and even lost his boxing license for a time. Refusing to go to war in 1967, Ali sat back and took the blows. However, he did such with the greater victory in mind.

    Counterpunching in 1971, Ali proved victorious after the Supreme Court ruled in his favor in the case Clay v. United States (Freedom Forum Institute). Much like in the ring, Ali waited to make his move and eventually won his fight.

    As Ali once said, “He who is not courageous enough to take risks will accomplish nothing in life” (USA Today). Taking punches put his health and chances to win at risk. Utilizing his First Amendment rights to speak out against the U.S. government put his career at risk. Behind every victory is a solid game plan and the ability to execute. Ali demonstrated both, as a boxer and an American citizen.

    References:

    https://www.aclu.org/muhammad-ali

    https://www.britannica.com/sports/rope-a-dope

    https://www.freedomforuminstitute.org/2013/02/21/muhammad-ali-and-the-first-amendment/

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/boxing/2016/06/03/muhammad-ali-best-quotes-boxing/85370850/

    ReplyDelete